Comparison of histopathologic changes and expression of biomarkers in breast carcinoma before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy / 中华病理学杂志

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To investigate the relationship between the pathologic responses and histologic type, grade, the expression of ER, PR and HER2 and their changes in breast carcinoma before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Two-hundred and nine cases of breast cancer with NAC were analyzed and clinical, pathologic data were evaluated based on the Miller and Payne ( MP) grading system. The expression of ER, PR and HER2 in the cancers before and after NAC were detected by immunohistochemistry (MaxVision method). SPSS 15.0 software was used to conduct statistical analysis.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>(1) Pathologic responses to the NAC were graded as MP1 (14 cases), MP2 (35 cases), MP3 (106 cases), MP4 (36 cases) and MP5 (18 cases); (2) The expression of ER in core needle biopsy had related negatively to the pathologic response (chi2 = 33.083, P = 0.001). However, the histologic type, grade, ER and PR status, and HER2 expression in surgically-removed specimens had not related to the pathologic response (P>0.05); (3) After NAC, the pathologic type and grade changed in 6. 8% (9/132) and 34.9% (30/86) of the cases, and the rates of changes in the expression of ER, PR and HER2 were 42.4% (75/177), 55.4% (98/177) and 26.6% (46/173) , respectively. Only the expression of HER2 had significant difference between before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.049). The changes in other data had no relationship with the pathologic response (P>0.05).</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Analysis of core needle biopsy can provide important information to predict the pathologic responses to the NAC. The pathologic appearance, grade, ER, PR and HER2 in breast carcinoma may change after NAC. It is necessary to examine the histologic type, grade and the expression of ER, PR and HER2 after NAC once more.</p>

Differences between clinical response and pathologic response of breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy / 中华病理学杂志

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>to investigate the pathologic basis of the difference between clinical response and pathologic response of breast carcinoma after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>two hundred and nine cases of breast cancer with neoadjuvant therapy were analyzed and clinical data were collected from June, 2005 to December, 2007. All patients had core needle biopsy taken before neoadjuvant chemotherapy and were operated within 4 weeks after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Clinical examination, X-ray of breast and/or B ultrasonography of primary breast focus were taken before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Clinical responses of breast primary focus were evaluated according to RECIST (response evaluation criteria in solid tumors) version 1.1.Pathologic responses of breast primary focus were evaluated according to Miller and Payne (MP) grading system. SPSS 15.0 software was used to statistical analysis.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>(1) Clinical responses basing on clinical examination showed complete response, partial response, stable disease and progressive response, in 33, 124, 41 and 11 cases respectively. (2) Eighty-seven cases had X-ray of breast taken before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Clinical response basing on X-ray, showed complete response, partial response and stable disease in 8, 42 and 37 cases respectively. (3) Pathologic responses of breast primary focus were as MP1 (14 cases), MP2 (35 cases), MP3 (106 cases), MP4 (36 cases) and MP5 (18 cases). (4) The clinical response basing on clinical examination were related to the pathologic response (χ(2) = 33.668, P = 0.001); and the clinical response basing on X-ray of breast were also related to the pathologic response (χ(2) = 22.404, P = 0.004). (5) The pathologic basis of the difference between the pathologic response and the clinical response basing on X-ray of breast were: embolism of carcinoma, mucinous carcinoma, intraductal carcinoma with ossifying-type calcification, nodular fibrosis and others.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>the clinical response may be related to the pathologic response. The difference between the two may be caused by pathologic changes. Some benign and malignant pathologic changes may contribute to the under-estimation of clinical response over pathologic response; whereas embolism of carcinoma may contribute to the over-estimation of clinical response over pathologic response.</p>

A comparison of localization by ductoscopy-guided wire and conventional methods in terminal duct excision for women with pathological nipple discharge / 中华肿瘤杂志

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To evaluate and compare localization by ductoscopy-guided wire with localization by conventional methods in the terminal duct excision for women with pathological nipple discharge.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Breast terminal duct excision were performed in 174 consecutive patients with intraductal lesions diagnosed by mammary ductoscopy. Sixty-eight of those underwent ductoscopy-guided wire localization for more accurate ductal excision. The patients received mammary ductoscopy and a hooked wire was anchored at the intraductal lesions under endoscopic surveillance just before the operation. Then a biopsy resection of wire-guided terminal duct and frozen section were done. Tbe other 106 patients received terminal duct excision under localization with conventional methods without ductoscopy either by puncturing a needle or injection of blue dye through the duct with pathological discharge.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Of the 68 patients with ductoscopy-guided duct excision, 64 had intraductal papillomas and 4 duct carcinoma in situ proved by pathology. All the lesions in these 68 patients were completely resected during biopsy without extra extended resection, and the concordance rate of the pathological result with ductoscopic diagnosis was 100.0%. None of them developed a postoperative breast distortion. In the conventional method localization group, there were 96 intraductal papilloma, 6 duct carcinoma in situ and 4 adenosis. Only 77.4% of the lesions were excised in the primary biopsy, and 22.6% needed extended resection. The concordance rate of the pathological diagnosis with ductoscopic diagnosis was 96.2%. Twenty-six patients had a deformed breast postoperatively.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Ductoscopy-guided wire localization is superior to the conventional localization method in the surgical terminal duct excision for women with spontaneous nipple discharge. It is not only helpful for more accurate localization and resection as well as pathologic sampling, but also is minimally invasive. Further studies are still required and this method may deserve to be popularized.</p>